A lot of people might wonder why we're trying to disprove evolution when most believe it as fact. Let us just remind you that the full title is "The Theory of Evolution". Any theory in science should be supported by facts to be proven correct. Unfortunately for evoltuionists, there is no empirical evidence for their religion.
The theory began with Charles Darwin when he noticed the unique similarities between different types of finches. He came to the conclusion that the birds must've had a common ancestor. (We agree with that Darwin...hmmm... the ancestor was a bird.) He then concluded that all living things must be related to eachother, given enough time. This basically sums up evolution: Over billions and billions of years, animals evolved from lower life forms to what we have today. All plants, animals, people, unicellular organisms, and even rocks are related! Though there is no factual evidence for this claim, it is being taught in every public school in the United States and throughout the world.
"The Theory of Evolution" starts 20 billion years ago when "nothing"* exploded after violently spinning out of control. It shot particles and gas into the universe that then somehow evolved into stars (though no star has ever been seen evolving), planets, moons, galaxies, different gases and elements and then the earth appeared. In the 1800's, evolutionists believed the earth to be 76,000 years old. When America landed on the moon, it was 3.5 billion years old. Today, evolutionists nod their head in agreement that the Earth is 4.6 billion years old. And so, in the beginning (4.6 billion years ago) the Earth's first formation was a hot molten mass of rock with no signs of life. Approximately 3 billion years ago, it began to rain on the rocks for millions of years. This rain cooled the rocks down and created "primordial soup" or pre-biotic soup. The soup then came alive with the first unicellular orginisms and over the next few billion years, more complicated life evolved.
Sounds like a pretty theory for evolutionists but where's the evidence? Wouldn't there be thousands upon thousands, even millions, of "intermediate species" showing the gradual change from less evolved species into more evolved species? If the theory is correct, there would be. But there isn't. All the evidence for evolution that is shown is based upon invalid inferences and bad judgment. Most of the "ape-men" have been proven false and are artist's depictions of what bones looked like!
We'd like to sum up with a few more questions. A termite eats wood but it cannot digest it. Little critters inside the termite digest the cellulose for it. One cannot live without the other. Which evolved first? Actually, millions of symbiotic relationships exist in nature. Which one of the two evolved first? Also, if evolution is correct, how do we get males/females and non-material things such as emotions, i.e. love, care, affection? The only possible answer to these questions would be that a Designer made them all within a few days of eachother.
We here at E.L.I.E believe that Designer is the God of the Bible. He made it all in 6 literal days about 6000 years ago. Got questions? Shoot.
* Sinse the begining of the Theory of Big Bang, the concept of its size has changed dramatically. Originally it was thought to be light years wide, but then coaxed down to "the size of the period at the end of this sentence" like many science books will state. Today, however, many scientist agree that the Big Bang began as a ball of "nothing". Taking up no space, or mass. Funny theory, no?
